Five Reasons Why Everton Should Avoid Cahill Return
Bookmark and Share

Last week saw Tim Cahill pay a visit to some of his old team mates at Everton's training complex and has since been sounding out a loan move back to Goodison Park.

The Australian made no secret of his desire to pull on the blue jersey one again, claiming: "I am eager to come back and hopefully something can be done with Everton."

Despite an earlier article on this site suggesting that a double loan swoop for Landon Donovan and Cahill would benefit the Blues this winter, perhaps the latter should be avoided.

The Blue Kangaroo's loyalty and ability for Everton can never be questioned, and if he did return he would be given a hero's welcome after eight years of tremendous service under David Moyes.

Perhaps it is fitting however, that Cahill's final involvement for the Toffees resulted in him being sent off for confronting Newcastle's Yohan Cabaye after the Frenchman had pushed a Goodison ball boy earlier in the final game of last season.

He cared for the club and it cared for him.

An overused term in football is 'never go back,' a term that Landon Donovan and Duncan Ferguson in recent Everton history can claim is nonsense.

But for every Donovan there is a Gravesen and for every Ferguson there is a Jeffers, two players who returned to Everton and endured much less successful stints.

With that in mind, this article will argue five reasons why Cahill and Everton should take note of that overused cliché and avoid tarnishing his reputation as a modern day Everton legend.


1. Cahill's form towards the end of his Everton career dipped

A Premier League goal tally of 56 is very impressive when you consider he was not actually a striker. In fact, only Duncan Ferguson can claim to have scored more than that for the Blues with 60. The fact that Cahill was by no means the most gifted of footballers was often forgiven due to his work ethic and goal threat. However, during the final 18 months of his Everton career, the goals began to dry up. His passion and work rate was still apparent, but Cahill was no longer influencing games in the way he used to.


2. Marouane Fellaini has shone in the role behind Jelavic

With Darron Gibson, Leon Osman, Thomas Hitzlsperger and Phil Neville competing for the two central midfield slots, the Belgian has been able to play in a more advanced role. It is still up for debate which position best suits Fellaini, but a return of six Premier League goals so far shows that it has been effective. A Cahill return would provide competition for this role. But would a two month loan stint to possibly sit on the bench and be brought on for the last ten minutes similarly to how Ferguson was used towards the end of his career suit either party?


3. The recall of Ross Barkley

The Wavertree born star was sent out on loan to Sheffield Wednesday earlier in the season. He took a few games to settle in but a return of four goals from 13 appearances in a midfield berth is an impressive return. Moyes has decided to recall the 18-year old after it was confirmed that Phil Neville will be missing for 6-8 weeks and Darron Gibson still battling his way back to full fitness. Barkley appeared to be benefiting from first team football at Hillsborough and it would be a shame to see his progression halted purely to act as cover for Everton's first team. The potential return of Cahill would surely see Barkley pushed further down the pecking order at Goodison and it is important that this stage of his career is not spent sitting on the bench.


4. Everton's expansive style of play

It has been widely reported that Everton have been playing a more expansive style of football this season. In fact, at the risk of glorifying pointless stats as so often happens, David Moyes' side have had more shots at goal than any other team in the top five leagues this season (England, Spain, Italy, Germany, France). This attacking football has been a result of some intricate play between the more creative players such as Pienaar, Baines, Mirallas, Osman, Fellaini and Jelavic. Cahill wouldn't really suit this style of play. He thrived off late runs into the box and darts to the near post. The current style that Everton appear to have adopted would arguably be wasted on the Australian.


5. The board have to appear to be looking forward

That point should read, 'the board have to look forward', which of course they do. But even if they are looking to the future, bringing back Cahill would not signify this. They sanctioned a move to sign Belgian midfield general Vadis Odjidja-Ofoe in the summer only for the deal to be blocked by FIFA. Unless that money set aside has disappeared, surely a second attempt to sign Ofoe would be more beneficial in the long term for Everton Football Club. Also, looking forward doesn't necessarily have to mean being in the market for new players (though it would be welcomed). The likes of Apostolos Vellios, Matthew Kennedy, John Lundstram, Junior Silva and Conor McAleny will be chomping at the bit for first team action and beginning to blood them into the side would surely be a better option.


There is no doubt that there is something about Tim Cahill that is different to most modern day footballers. He clearly cares a lot about Everton Football Club and his eight years of loyal service will always be remembered. Those memories should however, remain untarnished and a sentimental return would jeopardise that. The Gwladys Street Preacher


Follow The Gwladys Street Preacher on Twitter @GaryMaidenEFC

Email Bluekipper at

Comments about Five Reasons Why Everton Should Avoid Cahill Return
I want to remember tiny as a good memory. If he comes back it will tarnish it!
mike, upper bullens, 2:28 PM 22/11/2012
Did you deliberately miss Pienaar out of your "never go back" theory? Tim was top for years, but, injuries and tiredness usually picked up playing for the Kangaroos slowed him down to a shadow of his former self. I can't see how playing in an inferior league would have him sharp enough for Prem action. He'd be just about on his way home when he caught up. Shame because I'd love to see him twatting a corner flag again.
Win, Stafford, 1:50 PM 21/11/2012
I agree with parts but disagree with others. I'd like to see the Cahill of 3-4 yrs ago back, but not the Cahill of his last 12 months at the club. As is mentioned he doesn't have the legs anymore to do the full 90 in the prem and bringing him back could block the progression of others. Regarding Barkley though, I think Cahill coming back would allow Barkley to return to Sheff Wed which I think is the best place for him at the moment. Fellaini doesn't like the forward role, he prefers to sit deeper in the midfield, Cahill behind Jelavic would allow Fellaini to play his preferred role. Whether that is more beneficial to the team is up to Moyes to decide, but its what Felli wants. Also, surely Evertons new 'expansive style of play' would suit somebody arriving late into the box and darting runs. A number of our goals this season have come from the likes of Baines/Pienaar/Mirallas getting to the by-line and getting just inside the 18 yard box then pulling it back or across the face of goal, a late run into the box, usually in Cahill's case it was unmarked too, would be ideal to poach goals from these situations. Naismith in the derby and Jelavic away to Villa are two examples that come to mind of us pulling the ball back into the box where late runs by Cahill would be well suited.
Bored, Work, 12:57 PM 21/11/2012
As long as it costs us nothing bring him back get rid of his ban and give him the send off the man deserves plus he could come in handy
Ste, Liverpool, 12:38 PM 21/11/2012
I've also watched a few New York games he's played in and to be honest he has looked largely ineffective and hasn't really stood out. As much as I love him, like we all do, it would feel like a backwards step to me. Added to that he will still have his suspension to serve as a few have mentioned.
Dan, Rainford, 12:33 PM 21/11/2012
I agree to an extent his form did drop towards the latter stages. Many of our goals have come from poacher like finishes, i therefore don't agree that our style of play would be "wasted on him"
Tom, Everton, 12:17 PM 21/11/2012
Yes I'd have him back but only as a sub for the last half hour and even then only if we are winning and someone needs a break. Tim was great for us but his legs have gone now and he can't cut it at prem level for 90 minutes. That's how ruthless the game is. There's no taking away how good he was or what he did for us though, at his peak an absolute inspiration. It would be good if we could give him one last hurrah, we owe him that at least.
Spectator, Crosby, 12:11 PM 21/11/2012
Well written and I agree with your sermon brother. Amen.
LES, PHUKET, 10:52 AM 21/11/2012
I am correct in thinking that he still has a three game ban pending if he does return?
jinkin03, Aintree, 10:48 AM 21/11/2012
If he wants to train with us to keep his fitness up, let him he'll be great to have around the dressing room but keep him away from the team sheet. Hasnt he got a three game suspension to serve also.
Joe, Liverpool, 10:47 AM 21/11/2012
New comment about Five Reasons Why Everton Should Avoid Cahill Return

Reload Image
 Please type the string above in the input box below.